Trump Asks Supreme Court to Let Federal Layoffs Move Forward
By Dan Gooding and Amanda Castro
On Monday, the Trump administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court to pause a federal judge's order blocking mass layoffs and agency restructuring, part of President Donald Trump's plan to downsize the government.
The Justice Department's request follows a May 22 ruling by U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco, who sided with unions, nonprofits, and local governments opposing the large-scale federal job cuts.
"The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the President does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers," U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer wrote in his filing. "The district court's injunction violates these bedrock principles and other well-established doctrines."
Newsweek reached out to the American Federation of Government Employees, which brought the original suit, for comment via contact form.
Why It Matters
The case affects multiple departments, including Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, where the Trump administration has sought to cut the number of employees, arguing that the federal government is bloated and costs taxpayers too much money.
What To Know
The U.S. District Judge issued a temporary restraining order on May 10 for an initial 14 days, but it was later extended. It barred federal agencies from moving forward with job cuts, which plaintiffs argued could dramatically impact a range of services from veterans affairs to food safety inspections.
Part of the argument against the cuts has been the speed at which the Trump administration, through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), initially moved on the plan, with hundreds of workers dismissed with little notice.
In Monday's filing, Sauer stated that the plaintiffs had ignored the official methods established by Congress to handle employment and labor disputes, and that the president does have the power to implement the changes he has sought.
Donald Trump Supreme Court
Main: The Supreme Court in in Washington, D.C., as seen on April 25, 2024. Inset: President Donald Trump speaks in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, on May 30, 2025. AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File/Julia Demaree Nikhinson
Read more Supreme Court
Rand Paul Thinks There Are Enough GOP Senators to Block Trump Budget Bill
Supreme Court Allows Trump to End Legal Protections for 500,000 Migrants
Mike Pence Accuses Donald Trump of Ignoring Constitution
Amendment to Give Trump a Third Term Has 'A Lot of Support': GOP Rep
The Solicitor General cites Article II, which grants the president the authority to oversee personnel decisions within the executive branch, encompassing numerous federal departments and agencies.
He also stated that the injunction was causing "ongoing and severe harm" by keeping thousands of people employed at taxpayer expense, despite the administration's determination that they are no longer required.
The appeal to the Supreme Court is the latest in a string of cases in which the White House has asked the justices to intervene, ranging from immigration to government spending, arguing that lower courts should not have the power to issue nationwide injunctions.
What People Are Saying
U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer, in his appeal: "Every day that the preliminary injunction remains in effect, a government-wide program to implement agency RIFs is being halted and delayed, maintaining a bloated and inefficient workforce while wasting countless taxpayer dollars. In these circumstances, an administrative stay is warranted while this Court assesses the government's entitlement to a stay."
U.S. District Judge Susan Illston previously wrote in a 42-page order, as reported by The New York Times: "It is the prerogative of presidents to pursue new policy priorities and to imprint their stamp on the federal government. But to make large-scale overhauls of federal agencies, any president must enlist the help of his co-equal branch and partner, the Congress."
What Happens Next
With little time left in this year's Supreme Court session, it remains unclear whether the court will take up the case.
Welcome to Billionaire Club Co LLC, your gateway to a brand-new social media experience! Sign up today and dive into over 10,000 fresh daily articles and videos curated just for your enjoyment. Enjoy the ad free experience, unlimited content interactions, and get that coveted blue check verification—all for just $1 a month!
Account Frozen
Your account is frozen. You can still view content but cannot interact with it.
Please go to your settings to update your account status.
Open Profile Settings