BillionaireClubCollc
  • News
  • Notifications
  • Shop
  • Cart
  • Media
  • Advertise with Us
  • Profile
  • Groups
  • Games
  • My Story
  • Chat
  • Contact Us
home shop notifications more
Signin
  •  Profile
  •  Sign Out
Skip to content

Billionaire Club Co LLC

Believe It and You Will Achieve It

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • Politics
  • TSR
  • Anime
  • Michael Jordan vs.Lebron James
  • Crypto
  • Soccer
  • Dating
  • Airplanes
  • Forex
  • Tax
  • New Movies Coming Soon
  • Games
  • CRYPTO INSURANCE
  • Sport
  • MEMES
  • K-POP
  • AI
  • The Bahamas
  • Digital NoMad
  • Joke of the Day
  • RapVerse
  • Stocks
  • SPORTS BETTING
  • Glamour
  • Beauty
  • Travel
  • Celebrity Net Worth
  • TMZ
  • Lotto
  • COVD-19
  • Fitness
  • The Bible is REAL
  • OutDoor Activity
  • Lifestyle
  • Culture
  • Boxing
  • Food
  • LGBTQ
  • Poetry
  • Music
  • Misc
  • Open Source
  • NASA
  • Science
  • Natural & Holstict Med
  • Gardening
  • DYI
  • History
  • Art
  • Education
  • Pets
  • Aliens
  • Astrology
  • Farming and LiveStock
  • LAW
  • Fast & Furious
  • Fishing & Hunting
  • Health
  • Credit Repair
  • Grants
  • All things legal
  • Reality TV
  • Africa Today
  • China Today
  • "DUMB SHIT.."
  • Fast & Furious

Appeals judge baffled by X’s loss over Calif. moderation law, orders injunction

Enlarge (credit: Marc Piasecki / Contributor | Getty Images Entertainment)

Elon Musk's X has won its appeal on free speech grounds to block AB 587, a California law requiring social media companies to submit annual reports publicly explaining their controversial content moderation decisions.
In his opinion, Ninth Circuit court of appeals judge Milan Smith reversed a district court's ruling that he said improperly rejected Musk's First Amendment argument. Smith was seemingly baffled to find that the "district court performed, essentially, no analysis on this question."
According to Smith, the district court "offered no reason" for finding that AB 587 only compelled commercial speech "except for wanting" to follow "the lead of the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits,” which never dealt with "speech similar" to AB 587's required content moderation reports. Instead, Smith said, the district court seemed to take up California's invitation to invent a new category of commercial speech that did not clash with the First Amendment.Read 20 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Welcome to Billionaire Club Co LLC, your gateway to a brand-new social media experience! Sign up today and dive into over 10,000 fresh daily articles and videos curated just for your enjoyment. Enjoy the ad free experience, unlimited content interactions, and get that coveted blue check verification—all for just $1 a month!

Source link

Share
What's your thought on the article, write a comment
0 Comments
×

Sign In to perform this Activity

Sign in
×

Account Frozen

Your account is frozen. You can still view content but cannot interact with it.

Please go to your settings to update your account status.

Open Profile Settings

Ads

  • Premium Billionaire128 Unisex Long Sleeve Tee

    $ 25.00
  • Original Billionaire128 iPhone Case

    $ 15.50
  • Premium Billionaire128 Cuffed Beanie

    $ 19.50
  • News Social

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Copyright © 2024 Billionaire Club Co LLC. All rights reserved