BillionaireClubCollc
  • News
  • Notifications
  • Shop
  • Cart
  • Media
  • Advertise with Us
  • Profile
  • Groups
  • Games
  • My Story
  • Chat
  • Contact Us
home shop notifications more
Signin
  •  Profile
  •  Sign Out
Skip to content

Billionaire Club Co LLC

Believe It and You Will Achieve It

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • Politics
  • TSR
  • Anime
  • Michael Jordan vs.Lebron James
  • Crypto
  • Soccer
  • Dating
  • Airplanes
  • Forex
  • Tax
  • New Movies Coming Soon
  • Games
  • CRYPTO INSURANCE
  • Sport
  • MEMES
  • K-POP
  • AI
  • The Bahamas
  • Digital NoMad
  • Joke of the Day
  • RapVerse
  • Stocks
  • SPORTS BETTING
  • Glamour
  • Beauty
  • Travel
  • Celebrity Net Worth
  • TMZ
  • Lotto
  • COVD-19
  • Fitness
  • The Bible is REAL
  • OutDoor Activity
  • Lifestyle
  • Culture
  • Boxing
  • Food
  • LGBTQ
  • Poetry
  • Music
  • Misc
  • Open Source
  • NASA
  • Science
  • Natural & Holstict Med
  • Gardening
  • DYI
  • History
  • Art
  • Education
  • Pets
  • Aliens
  • Astrology
  • Farming and LiveStock
  • LAW
  • Fast & Furious
  • Fishing & Hunting
  • Health
  • Credit Repair
  • Grants
  • All things legal
  • Reality TV
  • Africa Today
  • China Today
  • "DUMB SHIT.."
  • CRYPTO INSURANCE

How Location and Skills Affect LinkedIn User Uniqueness on LinkedIn

:::info
Authors:
(1) Ángel Merino, Department of Telematic Engineering Universidad Carlos III de Madrid {[email protected]};
(2) José González-Cabañas, UC3M-Santander Big Data Institute {[email protected]}
(3) Ángel Cuevas, Department of Telematic Engineering Universidad Carlos III de Madrid & UC3M-Santander Big Data Institute {[email protected]};
(4) Rubén Cuevas, Department of Telematic Engineering Universidad Carlos III de Madrid & UC3M-Santander Big Data Institute {[email protected]}.
:::
Table of Links
Abstract and Introduction
LinkedIn Advertising Platform Background
Dataset
Methodology
User’s Uniqueness on LinkedIn
Nanotargeting proof of concept
Discussion
Related work
Ethics and legal considerations
Conclusions, Acknowledgments, and References
Appendix
5 User’s Uniqueness on LinkedIn

\

\
The results in the table show that using the location significantly reduces the number of skills required to identify users on LinkedIn uniquely. This reduction is roughly 2× for the random skill selection (i.e., SkR Vs. LoR) and 3×-4× for the least popular selection (i.e., SkLP Vs. LoLP).
\
In the LoR scenario, 8, 14, and 23 skills are enough to make a user unique on LinkedIn with a probability of 50%, 75%, and 90%, respectively. For LoLP, the number of skills that make a user unique with those same probabilities is 3, 6, and 18, respectively.
\
For the two scenarios that do not consider the user location, at least 28 skills are required to make a user unique with a probability ≥ 75%. If we look again at Figure 1, we observe that only around 30% of the users report 25 or more skills in their profile. This means that exclusively using the skills roughly reduces the nano-targetable users on LinkedIn to 1/3 of its user base. It is worth noting that this still represents a privacy risk for ∼250M LinkedIn users.
\
Our data sample shows that 99% of the users on LinkedIn publicly share their location. In practice, the advertiser (attacker) willing to target an individual will be able to use the location in the vast majority of the cases, which reduces a lot the number of skills required to successfully nanotarget the user.
\
In summary, our results show that the combination of the location and 6 rare skills reported by a user in their profile is enough to uniquely identify 3 out of 4 LinkedIn users. Increasing the number of skills to roughly 20 (rare or random) would allow uniquely identifying 9 out of 10 users.
5.1 Success Probability of Nanotargeting Campaigns

\
Figure 5 shows the expected success probability (y-axis) of a nanotargeting campaign based on the combination of the location and N skills (x-axis). The figure depicts an upper bound for the success probability (red line) computed for the case where the least popular skills are selected and a lower bound (blue line) that refers to the random selection approach. The results suggest that an advertiser would need to use (roughly) between 5-8 skills more to achieve the same success probability when applying the random skills selection instead of the least popular skills selection. This is true except for very high success probabilities, such as 95%, where both strategies require a very similar number of skills.
\
From a practical point of view, an advertiser willing to nanotarget an individual would use all the skills the individual reports in her profile because the cost of retrieving 1 or 40 skills is the same. If an advertiser selects all the skills, the random and least popular skill selection becomes the same strategy. Therefore, the success probability of a nanotargeting campaign is actually bounded by the amount of skills users report in their profiles. The more skills users report the more vulnerable they are to nanotargeting attacks.
\
:::info
This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license.
:::
\

Welcome to Billionaire Club Co LLC, your gateway to a brand-new social media experience! Sign up today and dive into over 10,000 fresh daily articles and videos curated just for your enjoyment. Enjoy the ad free experience, unlimited content interactions, and get that coveted blue check verification—all for just $1 a month!

Source link

Share
What's your thought on the article, write a comment
0 Comments
×

Sign In to perform this Activity

Sign in
×

Account Frozen

Your account is frozen. You can still view content but cannot interact with it.

Please go to your settings to update your account status.

Open Profile Settings

Ads

  • Original Billionaire128 Laptop Sleeve

    $ 28.00
  • Premium Billionaire128 Men’s Athletic Long Shorts

    $ 40.00
  • Original Billionaire128 Basic Pillow

    $ 26.50
  • News Social

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Copyright © 2024 Billionaire Club Co LLC. All rights reserved